Muhammadiyah’s Moral Politics and the Cost of Non-partisanship 

By Pradana Boy Zulian and Nur Syafiqah Mohd Taufek, ISEAS Perspective

(Excerpts)

Executive Summary

  • As one of Indonesia’s oldest and biggest Muslim organisations, Muhammadiyah’s position on issues remains influential in policymaking. Its members are still co-opted by the ruling administration at the national and local levels, and its leaders often make public pronouncements to lobby for certain policies.
  • In the 1980s, Muhammadiyah adopted moral or “high” politics to avoid being misperceived as a political organisation. In 1986, Amien Rais, then a key activist who later became Muhammadiyah chairman in 1995, introduced the concept of moral politics, which aims to keep the organisation politically neutral and non-partisan while allowing it to voice out on issues based on the religious principle of amar ma’ruf wan nahi munkar (advocate the good, prevent harm).
  • Despite embracing a concept meant to be politically neutral, Muhammadiyah is not anti-politics. It encourages its members to build their political competence and participate in “low” politics by running as election candidates. It is considered vital for the organisation to gain support and resources for its missions through political channels.
  • This dualism has proven challenging to implement and has led to confusion among Muhammadiyah members. It has also led to internal division caused by members’ rigid and intolerant attitudes in their political preferences. In fact, Muhammadiyah members’ political participation is relatively low compared to their rivals, affecting their lobbying capabilities.

..the clash in views was partly driven by the lack of consensus on political theology. This draws back to the longstanding debate in the Islamic world regarding Islam’s role in society, which is also not settled within Muhammadiyah.. ..Haedar’s opponents’ view of Islam as din, dunya wa
dawlah (religion, world, and state). To this group of people who support Muhammadiyah taking a clear stance on political leadership, Islam and the state are inseparable entities.

..diverse theological worldview impacts Muhammadiyah by not firmly constructing a coherent political theology that all members, including supporters of rival leadership factions, can agree on..

..its disengagement from formal politics has led to a scarcity
of politically competent members..

Pradana Boy Zulian is Associate Professor in Islamic Legal Studies at Faculty of Islamic Studies, Muhammadiyah University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia. He was Visiting Fellow with the Regional Social and Cultural Studies Program at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. Nur Syafiqah Mohd Taufek is Research Officer at ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, Singapore, for the Regional Social and Cultural Studies Program

Read the whole paper at https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2024-91-muhammadiyahs-moral-politics-and-the-cost-of-non-partisanship-by-pradana-boy-zulian-and-nur-syafiqah-mohd-taufek/ or downloadable at this link.

In related reading:

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Discover more with Stories From Indonesia

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading